Traditional use and conservation of medicinal plants among Hehe society in Tanzania

Authors

  • Prisila Mkenda Department of Wildlife Management, College of African Wildlife Management, CAWM, P.O. Box 3031, Mweka, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
  • Gaston Mbilinyi Department of Biosciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Tanzania
  • Elly Ligate Department of Biosciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Tanzania
  • Frank Mbago Department of Botany, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam
  • Onsemo Simon Nyinondi Department of Language Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

Abstract

Background: The knowledge and use of medicinal plants are deeply rooted in the socio-cultural heritage of many African tribes. The study investigated the traditional use and conservation of medicinal plants among the Hehe community in Iringa, Tanzania, in response to increasing environmental pressure and demand for herbal remedies.

Methods: The research was conducted in Mufindi and Kilolo districts during July 2022 and May 2023 through social surveys and field visits to document local medicinal plant species and conservation practices employed. Thirty key informants, including traditional healers, village leaders, and elders, were interviewed alongside twelve focus group discussions with youth, men, and women. Field visits, aided by a botanist, facilitated the identification of species mentioned during the surveys.

Results: The study recorded 152 medicinal plant species across 61 families. Asteraceae and Fabaceae were the most represented families (16 species each), followed by Rubiaceae (12 species). An analysis of the IUCN Red List showed that most species were categorised as "Least Concern." However, Prunus africana was classified as "Vulnerable," and Warbugia ugandensis subsp. ugandensis, though unlisted, was noted as rare and heavily exploited. Leaves were the most used (44%), followed by roots (37%), stem bark (13%), fruits/seeds (3%), tubers (1%), and whole plants (2%). Trees were the most utilised (31%), followed closely by herbs (30%), shrubs (29%), climbers (7%), subshrubs (2%), and parasitic plants (1%). Traditional conservation practices employed were the use of sacred groves, spiritually guided harvesting, selective harvesting, and plant domestication.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the rich ethnobotanical knowledge of the Hehe people and highlight the need for sustainable conservation of medicinal plant resources.

Keywords: Traditional conservation, sacred groves, ethnobotany, Prunus africana, Warbugia ugandensis

Author Biographies

Gaston Mbilinyi, Department of Biosciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Tanzania

Senior Technician, Department of Biosciences

Elly Ligate, Department of Biosciences, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Tanzania

Senior Lecturer, Department of Biosciences

Frank Mbago, Department of Botany, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam

Botanist, Department of Botany

Onsemo Simon Nyinondi, Department of Language Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

Senior Lecturer, Department of Language Studies

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16

How to Cite

Mkenda, P., Mbilinyi, G., Ligate, E., Mbago, F. ., & Nyinondi, O. S. (2025). Traditional use and conservation of medicinal plants among Hehe society in Tanzania. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 32, 1–13. Retrieved from https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/6938

Issue

Vol. 32 (2025)

Section

Research

License

All articles are copyrighted by the first author and are published online by license from the first author. Articles are intended for free public distribution and discussion without charge. Accuracy of the content is the responsibility of the authors.