Are Our Students Taxonomically Challenged or Not?

Authors

  • Han Lau Department of Botany, University of Hawaii
  • Will C. McClatchey Department of Botany, University of Hawaii
  • David Reedy Department of Botany, University of Hawaii
  • Al Kealii Chock Department of Botany, University of Hawaii
  • Kim W. Bridges Department of Botany, University of Hawaii
  • Zak Ritchey Department of Botany, University of Hawaii

Keywords:

Folk classification, Human cognition, Taxonomy

Abstract

A class exercise to introduce plant taxonomy to non- science majors was conducted as part of the Botany Segue of our Introductory Ethnobotany course at the University of Hawai`i in Fall 2007. Students were given the opportunity to name and develop their own classification schemes for forty plant materials. This paper discusses the results of the class exercise. Binomials were used more often than monomials for plant names and the pattern was reversed for category names. Students used many adjectives and terms related to plant parts to name plants and categories. Of all the adjectives used, color and texture were used most often by students to name plants and categories respectively. In general, students were well aware of the different functional roles of plant and category names and illustrated this frequently by using binomials consisting of noun-adjective combinations to name plants and monomial nouns to name categories.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-16

How to Cite

Lau, H., McClatchey, W. C., Reedy, D., Chock, A. K., Bridges, K. W., & Ritchey, Z. (2009). Are Our Students Taxonomically Challenged or Not?. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 7, 029–037. Retrieved from https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/234

Issue

Section

Education